BlitzLearnAI
1 / 10
Day 3 of 14 · AI in Trade Credit Control

AI-Assisted Customer Credit Checks

A new customer wants credit terms. Sales is excited, the order is big, and everyone wants a fast yes. This is the exact moment most bad debt is born — because every bad debt was once a new customer someone didn't check properly.

The check itself isn't hard. What kills it is time pressure: a proper review means reading filed accounts, a credit report, and court records while sales taps their watch. Today you'll learn what to look at — and how AI compresses that reading from an hour to minutes, so "we didn't have time to check" stops being a reason.

What to look at before extending terms

Five sources tell you most of what you need:

Filed accounts. Most companies must file some level of accounts publicly. Look at whether they're profitable, whether they have more assets than liabilities, and which direction the numbers are moving. Late filings are a signal in themselves.

Payment history. Credit reference agencies report how a company typically pays its suppliers — on time, or consistently stretching terms. Past payment behavior is one of the strongest predictors of how they'll pay you.

Court judgments and liens. County court judgments (or your jurisdiction's equivalent), liens, and legal charges against the company mean other creditors have already had to force the issue. Treat them seriously.

Sector risk. A structurally struggling industry raises the risk of even a well-run customer. Their biggest customer's problems can become your problem.

Director history. Directors with a trail of dissolved or failed companies deserve a closer look. It isn't automatically disqualifying — but it changes the questions you ask.

No single source decides it. You're building a picture.

Knowledge Check
Why is a company's payment history with other suppliers so valuable in a credit check?
A
It shows exactly how much cash the company holds today
B
It replaces the need to look at filed accounts
C
How a company has paid other suppliers is one of the strongest predictors of how it will pay you
D
It's the only legally required part of a credit check
Filed accounts can be a year old, but payment behavior is current and habitual — a company that consistently stretches other suppliers to 90 days will almost certainly do the same to you. It complements the accounts; it doesn't replace them.

AI turns documents into a risk snapshot

Here's where the hour disappears. Credit reports and filed accounts are dense, jargon-heavy documents. AI is exceptionally good at reading them and producing a one-page risk snapshot: key financials, payment behavior, red flags, and the questions you should ask before saying yes.

The workflow: take the key figures and facts from the credit report and accounts, anonymize them (call the company "Prospect X" — the same hygiene rule as Day 2), paste them into your assistant, and ask for a structured snapshot with a recommendation and reasoning.

Two rules keep this honest:

Triangulate — AI summarizes sources, it isn't the source. Never ask a chatbot "is Acme Ltd creditworthy?" and trust the answer. It may hallucinate or rely on stale information. The data comes from credit agencies, filed accounts, and public registers; AI's job is to compress and structure what you feed it.

Document the decision. Save the snapshot, note what you decided and why, and date it. When an account goes wrong two years later — or when an auditor asks — "we reviewed X, Y, Z and approved a low starting limit on this basis" is worth a lot. AI even drafts that file note for you.

And the decision itself? Yours. AI recommends; a human approves every new account and every set of terms.

One-page customer risk snapshot with filed accounts strip, payment history bar, red flags row, and a verdict chip showing approve with low limit
The goal isn't a thicker file — it's one page you can defend. Snapshot, verdict, reasoning, date: that's a credit decision an auditor will respect.
🤖
ChatGPT
online
You are a credit analyst. Build a one-page risk snapshot from this anonymized data on "Prospect X" (wholesale bakery, wants 15,000 credit on 30-day terms): Credit report: score 42/100 (below sector average), pays suppliers 18 days beyond terms on average, one satisfied court judgment (2 years ago, 3,100), no current judgments. Abbreviated accounts (latest filing): net assets 28,000, down from 61,000 the year before. Cash 9,500. Filed 3 months late. Director: one previous company, dissolved without insolvency.
**RISK SNAPSHOT — Prospect X** **Financials:** Net assets positive but down more than half year-on-year — the trend is the concern, not the level. Cash of 9,500 is thin against a 15,000 limit request. Late filing is a minor but real yellow flag. **Payment behavior:** Pays 18 days beyond terms on average — expect your 30-day invoices to be paid around day 48. The old judgment was satisfied and isn't recent; the pattern matters more than the incident. **Red flags:** Falling net assets + slow payment + late filing = a customer under some cash strain, not a company in crisis. **Recommendation:** Approve with a LOW starting limit — around 5,000, not 15,000 — on 30-day terms, review after 3 months of trading history. Ask for a trade reference and their latest management accounts if they push for more. **Questions before you decide:** Why did net assets fall? Is the order seasonal or ongoing? This is my read of the data you provided — verify the figures against the original report, and the approval call is yours.
↻ Replay conversation
Knowledge Check
Why shouldn't you just ask a chatbot "Is Acme Ltd creditworthy?" and act on the answer?
A
The answer would be correct but too slow to be useful
B
The AI isn't a data source — it may hallucinate or use stale information, so it should only summarize data you feed it from real sources
C
Credit checks can only be performed by licensed credit agencies
D
Chatbots are not allowed to discuss real companies
AI is the summarizer, never the source. Facts come from credit reports, filed accounts, and public registers that you provide (anonymized). Asked cold, a chatbot can confidently produce outdated or invented "facts" about a company — exactly what a credit decision can't be built on.

Fast enough to always happen

Notice what the demo produced: a defensible middle path. Not "decline" (sales keeps its customer), not a blind "yes" to 15,000 — a small limit, a review date, and two sharp questions. That's a better decision than most gut calls, and it took minutes.

Speed is the real win here. When a proper check takes five minutes instead of an hour, it actually gets done — for every customer, every time. The check that doesn't happen is the one that becomes next year's write-off.

Tomorrow: the snapshot said "approve with a low limit" — but how do you size that limit? You'll build a simple, consistent method for setting credit limits that fit.

🔍
Day 3 Complete
"Every bad debt was once a new customer someone didn't check properly."
Tomorrow — Day 4
Setting Credit Limits That Fit
Tomorrow you'll replace gut-feel credit limits with a simple scoring rubric that AI helps you apply consistently to every customer.
🔥1
1 day streak!